Hold your horses there friendo, you might think the ball was dropped on getting feedback for this one specific issue but Ross and cheater have a good record for seeking community input on major decisions, such as the polls for what to do about potentially introducing Foila. That was quite possibly the biggest change we have ever made on the gamemode and they laid it out in full for the community to vote on.
They’ve also kept up with the routine of extensive mid-season polls, as well as engaging in a lot of the general discussions about features on the forums and in the discord.
Feedback is important, but keep it fair and specific pls.
9 Likes
Keep in mind though, that the poll above made by scop (cheater) so far has more no’s than yesses and I’ve seen no one comment on the other polls that clearly show the community liked survival as it was. If you need MORE evidence that people like the perks and think they don’t need to be changed, here’s polls from 2022 that reflect that as well. Survival Community Polls 2022! I think something might be that you guys (the staff) are ready to move on from these perks, but us players just aren’t. We’re used to the perks and we are sad to see them go because they will drastically change survival. What about those of us who want a more relaxing experience? A lot of people are like that but now we won’t be able to play like that anymore and I’m just asking, why doesn’t that point of view matter?
4 Likes
You’re more than correct. My apologies to @RossRao and @cheater , I completely missed these posts. The situation is a lot better than I thought it was, and it’s vivid this is just one slip-up. Sorry to the lads whom I might disappoint with this response.
Do hope, however, that going forwards any changes to this feature will be well-coordinated and discussed between the community and Ross and Cheater.
6 Likes
I just want to say I’m speaking for me and my friends and a lot of other people who dislike this one change, we are all hyped of season 5 still we just really dislike this one change.
Reminder to keep it civil and don’t blame them or view that as terrible people for this one thing as changes like this can get reverted!
3 Likes
You’re a star as always, Maccas 
A reset is an insanely massive project to handle and it’s almost impossible to keep on top of absolutely everything, but they’re very obviously up for feedback on stuff
6 Likes
I’ll be honest, you can’t compare things that happened 2 years ago to now… Munchy was alive, now Munchy has mostly OG players that have ranks. The player base evolves… 
I do respect your opinions though, but that feels a bit odd?
3 Likes
Why would the player base who gets access to these perks not want to have them still? If I paid for something and parts got taken away I wouldn’t like that I would like the full experience of what I played for 
.
Plus this was just a point by viv, this was 2 years ago yes and the server was more active then also yes but it doesn’t take away from the fact they like perks!
1 Like
That’s not what I meant. You’re free to like things even 2 years after. I just mean that a statement from 2 years ago isn’t a perfect reflection of what people can expect now. It’s like comparing kit 2 years ago and now… it’s dead, right?
Just the way kit died, other people opinions can change. Which is normal!
2 Likes
My point was that 2 years ago people liked the perks. This year for the polls, people liked the perks. Yes the player base and survival has changed, but the fact that most people wanted the perks and liked the perks as they were 2 years ago AND now, pushes what I was saying about the staff (and a select few others) are ready to move on and change the perks but the heart of the player base is not. I don’t really understand why none of the staff defending their decisions have brought up the polls they ran and expressed why they went against them. Yes, accusations about p2w have been prominent in the past, but I don’t see them all that often anymore, and I think ppl need to realize that servers need some way to make revenue to stay up. It’s not pay to win also! It’s survival! How do you win?
3 Likes
Well for that, you’ll have to re read this This topic !
It’s long but it made me acknowledge some things. So maybe you should pay it a full read!
2 Likes
It was hard to tell what you meant sorry-
And what are you saying with kit dying? What opinions changed? Like about what specifically can you tell me that please?
1 Like
I was meant to explain how things can change in a span of time. Sorry if it wasn’t clear enough… it wasn’t a target about opinions 
I tried my best but I suck at explaining most of the time
3 Likes
No worries go on! Also I reached my daily like limit aww ;(
Personally I am fine with change just some things are fine the way they are and considering people don’t get another feature back for what they payed it’s kinda stupid.
Using Kitpvp as an example if someone payed for ninja kit cause it’s op when they did nerf ninja kit those people didn’t complain cause the kit was the same but more balanced! This is an entirely new system!
Now you can argue when they reworked thor kit maybe some people would miss the old version but the thing is the kit became way more fun and people liked it! The survival community is giving feedback on this because they dislike it for the most part!
2 Likes
Gonna be honest, I don’t see your point through that post. A lot of ppl made points that make sense to me such as “every server is p2w to some degree” which is true because how else are they going to make money. I am in general in support of Munchy’s shop and I don’t consider it wrong to sell their ranks. I just think that with the high prices it isn’t the best choice to remove their top perks.
3 Likes
Yep! P2w is a slippery slope to dive in, these people aren’t really winning anything back before this feature they just keep their items. Now with this new feature given to anyone now with a price they are losing their arguably best perk and they get a perfectly fine feature that gave no advantage against players, leaderboards, or anything that people would complain about.
If it did give advantage people would’ve complained about it a lot more, people are complaining about it now because it’s getting removed and making people’s ranks more obsolete and changing one of best things they get with it.
guys who took down the poll
2 Likes
Indeed, the poll seems to be gone. When last I looked the votes were that people did not like the change to keep inventory.
1 Like
Okay now I am actually angry. The poll clearly showed that 75% of people didn’t like the new inventory changes. If scop deleted this, then that makes sense because scop is looking for rage bait like turtle and blizzard. (It’s still messed up if you deleted it though scop!) If an admin such as cheater deleted it though, that’s actually beyond effed up. You can’t just go and delete polls because people don’t agree with you.
4 Likes
literally
though not really up to date,
the results above were pretty similar to this (just only with twice the votes)
3 Likes
I get the frustration, but let’s not cry over this—it was essentially pay-to-win. Allowing ranked players to keep their inventory creates an unfair advantage and disrupts the game’s balance. Survival mode should challenge all players equally. Instead, let’s focus on providing ranked players with exclusive perks that don’t impact gameplay, like cool cosmetics or unique commands. This way, everyone enjoys a fair and rewarding experience!!
2 Likes